點(diǎn)擊上方“小白學(xué)視覺(jué)”，選擇加"星標(biāo)"或“置頂”
重磅干貨，第一時(shí)間送達(dá)
作者：萬(wàn)老師
https://www.zhihu.com/question/430036342/answer/1590607788
“This paper is, simply manure""What the authors have done is an insult to science"還有一條更讓人崩潰的是：
"You should look closely at a career outside of scinece"這是直接勸作者退出學(xué)術(shù)圈了啊……所以，想想如果你平時(shí)投稿時(shí)只是收到一些普通的拒稿郵件，哪怕就文章內(nèi)容批評(píng)幾句，已經(jīng)是多么幸運(yùn)的事！然而……
還有大量更毒的審稿意見(jiàn)，有些時(shí)候連審稿人自己都被“ 毒”到了，以下是 從2001年至2011年，《Environmental Microbiology》每年都會(huì)發(fā)布一些審稿意見(jiàn)集錦中收集的1. Reject – More holes than my grandad’s string vest!拒發(fā)。漏洞比我爺爺?shù)木W(wǎng)眼背心上的網(wǎng)眼還多！2. "Done! Difficult task, I don’t wish to think about constipation and faecal flora during my holidays! But, once a referee, always and anywhere a referee; we are good boy scouts in the research wilderness. Even under the sun and near a wonderful beach."
搞定了！太不容易了。我才不想裝著一腦子便秘和糞便菌落來(lái)度假。但是，一朝做了審稿人，永遠(yuǎn)都是審稿人，到哪兒都是審稿人。在科學(xué)研究的荒漠中，我們是勇敢的童子軍。即使在灑滿陽(yáng)光的沙灘上也是。哼！3. "This paper is desperate. Please reject it completely and then block the author’s email ID so they can’t use the online system in future."
這篇論文爛到家了。請(qǐng)徹底拒稿，然后封了作者的賬號(hào)，免得他日后繼續(xù)投稿。4. "The writing and data presentation are so bad that I had to leave work and go home early and then spend time to wonder what life is about."
寫(xiě)作水平和數(shù)據(jù)展示讓我整個(gè)人都不好了，我不得不提前下班，早點(diǎn)回家，甚至開(kāi)始懷疑人生。5. "The biggest problem with this manu, which has nearly sucked the will to live out of me, is the terrible writing style."
這篇稿件的寫(xiě)作風(fēng)格太糟糕了，審得我都不想活了。6. "The presentation is of a standard that I would reject from an undergraduate student."
就算回到本科生時(shí)期，我都會(huì)拒掉這種水平的投稿。7. "This paper is awfully written. There is no adequate objective and no reasonable conclusion. The literature is quoted at random and not in the context of argument. I have doubts about the methods and whether the effort of data gathering is sufficient to arrive at a useful conclusion."
這篇論文寫(xiě)得太爛了。目的不明確，結(jié)論不合理。引文都是亂引的，跟正文的論證完全對(duì)不上號(hào)。我懷疑這樣的實(shí)驗(yàn)方法，也懷疑他們收集的數(shù)據(jù)不足以得出有效結(jié)論。8. "Season’s Greetings! I apologise for my slow response but a roast goose prevented me from answering emails for a few days."
節(jié)日快樂(lè)！回復(fù)慢了，真抱歉。有一只烤鵝妨礙我，讓我?guī)滋於紱](méi)顧得上回郵件。見(jiàn)識(shí)過(guò)了審稿人的毒舌和幽默，再來(lái)見(jiàn)識(shí)一下審稿人怎么夸人。但當(dāng)審稿人遇到非常棒的論文，也會(huì)給出衷心的好評(píng)。好吧，為了鼓勵(lì)大家繼續(xù)好好寫(xiě)論文投論文，我們最后還是放些點(diǎn)贊的審稿意見(jiàn)吧
1. “Very much enjoyed reading this one, and do not have any significant comments. Wish I had thought of this one.”這篇論文讀起來(lái)簡(jiǎn)直是一種享受，沒(méi)有任何意見(jiàn)。這么好的點(diǎn)子我當(dāng)初怎么沒(méi)想到！2. “There was little I could think of to improve this nice paper.”
3. "This is as solid a write up as I have seen, many spend much more time and space to say considerably less. It is a perfect example of a compact report."
這是我見(jiàn)過(guò)的最確鑿的報(bào)告，許多人花更多時(shí)間精力寫(xiě)出來(lái)的比這個(gè)差多了。作為一篇翔實(shí)的報(bào)告，這是一個(gè)完美的例子。4. "landmark paper on P. putida physiology."
5. "It is always a joy to review manus such as this. Well conceived, well executed, well edited. Clean. Pristine. From start to finish."
評(píng)審這樣的稿件是件人生樂(lè)事：構(gòu)思周詳，實(shí)施得當(dāng)，寫(xiě)得漂亮。干凈，純樸，從頭至尾。作者：中間派
https://www.zhihu.com/question/430036342/answer/1587408730I cannot see any scientific contribution of this paper to the literature already published in the 19th century. Moreover, it contains substantial English and scientific errors nearly in every sentence.In summary，the paper could have been more relevant had it been published prior to the year 1818.發(fā)現(xiàn)回答寫(xiě)的有歧義 審稿人并沒(méi)有全文一句句指出錯(cuò)誤??！我只是想表達(dá)審稿人把有錯(cuò)誤的句子逐個(gè)列出來(lái)的意思作者：Jiazi
https://www.zhihu.com/question/430036342/answer/1593064029To be honest, I just read the abstract and took a quick glance on the tables and figures in the manuscript.
Considering that there are issues with literally EVERY sentence in the abstract, and the complete mess in the figures/tables, there is no need to waste time on it.
說(shuō)實(shí)話，我就讀了一下摘要，掃了一眼文中的圖表?？紤]到摘要中的每一句話都有問(wèn)題，以及圖表亂成渣，就沒(méi)有必要在這上面浪費(fèi)時(shí)間了。
然后把摘要里的每一句的錯(cuò)誤指出來(lái)——真的是摘要里每一句話都有錯(cuò)誤?。。。?/span>作者：覚醒屋
https://www.zhihu.com/question/430036342/answer/1599194181哈哈，我貼一個(gè)之前審過(guò)稿，這周剛抄送來(lái)的decision郵件——"The descriptions of the design are very vague, and, overall, authors do not highlight the differences between their design and previous proposals in the literature.""Besides that, there are many dubious statements and imprecisions along the paper""It is the last straw that I have found four other papers of the same authors, not referenced or mention in the submission, which describe very similar designs or the same parts of it. Bellow there are the references:"(There are no comments. Please check to see if comments were included as a file attachment with this e-mail or as an attachment in your Author Center.)下載1：OpenCV-Contrib擴(kuò)展模塊中文版教程
在「小白學(xué)視覺(jué)」公眾號(hào)后臺(tái)回復(fù)：擴(kuò)展模塊中文教程，即可下載全網(wǎng)第一份OpenCV擴(kuò)展模塊教程中文版，涵蓋擴(kuò)展模塊安裝、SFM算法、立體視覺(jué)、目標(biāo)跟蹤、生物視覺(jué)、超分辨率處理等二十多章內(nèi)容。下載2：Python視覺(jué)實(shí)戰(zhàn)項(xiàng)目52講在「小白學(xué)視覺(jué)」公眾號(hào)后臺(tái)回復(fù)：Python視覺(jué)實(shí)戰(zhàn)項(xiàng)目，即可下載包括圖像分割、口罩檢測(cè)、車(chē)道線檢測(cè)、車(chē)輛計(jì)數(shù)、添加眼線、車(chē)牌識(shí)別、字符識(shí)別、情緒檢測(cè)、文本內(nèi)容提取、面部識(shí)別等31個(gè)視覺(jué)實(shí)戰(zhàn)項(xiàng)目，助力快速學(xué)校計(jì)算機(jī)視覺(jué)。下載3：OpenCV實(shí)戰(zhàn)項(xiàng)目20講在「小白學(xué)視覺(jué)」公眾號(hào)后臺(tái)回復(fù)：OpenCV實(shí)戰(zhàn)項(xiàng)目20講，即可下載含有20個(gè)基于OpenCV實(shí)現(xiàn)20個(gè)實(shí)戰(zhàn)項(xiàng)目，實(shí)現(xiàn)OpenCV學(xué)習(xí)進(jìn)階。交流群
歡迎加入公眾號(hào)讀者群一起和同行交流，目前有SLAM、三維視覺(jué)、傳感器、自動(dòng)駕駛、計(jì)算攝影、檢測(cè)、分割、識(shí)別、醫(yī)學(xué)影像、GAN、算法競(jìng)賽等微信群（以后會(huì)逐漸細(xì)分），請(qǐng)掃描下面微信號(hào)加群，備注：”昵稱(chēng)+學(xué)校/公司+研究方向“，例如：”張三 + 上海交大 + 視覺(jué)SLAM“。請(qǐng)按照格式備注，否則不予通過(guò)。添加成功后會(huì)根據(jù)研究方向邀請(qǐng)進(jìn)入相關(guān)微信群。請(qǐng)勿在群內(nèi)發(fā)送廣告，否則會(huì)請(qǐng)出群，謝謝理解~
